God wants us to act ethically

The Torah never explicitly designates where the Beit Hamikdash (Temple) is to stand. In fact, it never mentions the city of Jerusalem by that name at all. At every point, the Torah says, המקום אשר יבחר- “The place that He will choose.” At some future point, the Torah promises, God will choose a geographic location for His dwelling place.

The phrase “מקום אשר יבחר” (“the place that he will choose”) appears 22 times in the Torah. In 21 of those instances, the pronouns refer to G-d and Jerusalem. He—G-d—will choose a place—Jerusalem. Once, in our Sedra of Ki Tetze, they do not:

לֹא תַסְגִּיר עֶבֶד אֶל אֲדֹנָיו אֲשֶׁר יִנָּצֵל אֵלֶיךָ מֵעִם אֲדֹנָיו.
עִמְּךָ יֵשֵׁב בְּקִרְבְּךָ בַּמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר יִבְחַר בְּאַחַד שְׁעָרֶיךָ בַּטּוֹב לוֹ לֹא תּוֹנֶנּוּ.

You shall not turn over to his master a slave who seeks refuge with you from his master. He shall live with you in any place he may choose among the settlements in your midst, wherever he pleases; you must not ill-treat him.

Here, “he” is the slave and the “place” is his chosen place of refuge. Of all the possible formulations, why did Moshe in his speech (which comprises the bulk of the book of Devarim) choose this particular wording, which clearly hearkens back to the mentions of the Beit Hamikdash?

Rabbi Amnon Bazak, a renowned teacher of Tanakh in Israel, suggests that Moshe meant to convey a profound message through his careful selection of words. Throughout his great speech to the Israelites, Moshe repeatedly emphasized the social, ethical, and moral aspects of the Mitzvot. He especially emphasized the concern for the weaker members of society, among them the slaves and maidservants. The simple interpretation of this prohibition, of returning an escaped slave to his master, is that it too is a moral precept: if the slave fled his master, he probably suffered and was treated very poorly, and therefore we are prohibited from returning him to his place of suffering.

By using this unique phrase, מקום אשר יבחר, Moshe thus highlights the correlation between the Jewish people’s ethical conduct and the Hashra’at Shekhina, the manifestation of G-d’s presence, among them. As if to say, “If you wish for G-d to indeed manifest His Divine Presence among you ‘in the place that He will choose,’ then you must also be morally upstanding ethical people, especially in the way you treat the weaker members of society. Among other things, you must allow an escaped slave to dwell with you ‘in the place that he will choose.’”

As we approach Rosh Hashanah, let us ask ourselves, are we living up to this challenge? Would G-d be proud, so to speak, to dwell among us? How are we treating the weaker members of our society? What can we do better – how can we continue to improve our ethical conduct, relationships, and our commitment to the ethical aspects of mitzvot as well as the ritual ones?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Long Way from the Wonder Pot

  Artzeinu, KJ's weekly publication with Israel news updates, published a special 75th Anniversary Issue in which several writers were asked to answer the question, "Where will Israel be 75 years from now?" Below is the answer I contributed I have a childhood memory of flipping through my mother’s old Israeli recipes and noticing a recipe for a Bundt cake. However, instead of baking it in an oven, this cake was to be cooked on a stovetop, in a Sir Peleh – a  "Wonder Pot." Shortly after the founding of the State of Israel, her Jewish population doubled. The government established the tsena period, a period of austerity, to ensure that everyone had the resources they needed. Citizens received rations of flour, eggs, oil, and other ingredients, and there were limits on the purchase of furniture and household objects. Most people did not own an oven and many did not even own a stove; cooking took place on a portable gas burner known as p’tiliya . But without an ove
Read more

Should we still recite the Prayer for the State of Israel if we disagree with its government?

  A Letter to the Editor published in The Forward's Opinion section (see original here ) Re: “ Why this Zionist rabbi has stopped saying the Prayer for the State of Israel ”  by Jodi Rudoren Should we pray for the State of Israel? I certainly think so, but some of my rabbinic colleagues have proclaimed that, in light of their disagreement with Israel’s new governing coalition, their congregations will stop reciting the usual prayer for the State of Israel. That prayer was written in 1948 by some combination of Chief Rabbis Isaac Herzog and Ben-Zion Meir Hai Uziel and edited by Noble laureate Shai (S.Y.) Agnon. For decades, its prominent recitation on Shabbat and holiday mornings has been de rigueur at Zionist congregations. “How can we pray for the success of a government with which we disagree so vehemently? How can we claim that the State of Israel represents the ‘first flowering of our redemption’ (r eishit tz’michat ge’ulateinu )? This is not the redemption we have been praying
Read more

Is Chazzanut Good for KJ?

Adapted from a sermon delivered at KJ on Shabbat Va'era The beginning of Parashat Va’era describes a critical conversation that took place between God and Moshe. God told Moshe that a new chapter was about to unfold for the Jewish People, as God will now be known by a new name. “I appeared to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as El Shaddai , but I did not make Myself known to them by My name Hashem .” The problem with this statement is that it’s not true. The name, Hashem, was in fact so familiar to Abraham that he even called God by that name early in their relationship, asking “Oh Hashem , what can You give me?” God introduced Himself to Jacob by that name too: “I am Hashem , the God of your father Abraham.” So what then is the meaning of God’s words to Moshe that I did not make Myself known to them by My name Hashem ?” Seforno (16th century Italy) suggested that God did not mean that He never used the name Hashem when interacting with the forefathers, but rather that the attributes an
Read more